Glad I was able to communicate what I was going for! Was worried the point was a bit muddled, but I think that review and particular episode nicely demonstrates what route the series was going down. Not bad in it's own right, but definitely a lot more wacky with characterization kinda going out the window (Homer's stupidity kinda driving the plot as opposed to him just sort of being a regular guy in an awkward situation).
Criticisms about the series even prior to this point are nothing new. I recall reading an interview snippet from Al Jean in which he states he had read some criticism around Season 4/5's air date that personally felt the series was running low on ideas? He then reflects on it, stating something along the lines of 'now they agree Season 4 is good. And now I'm like, I'm glad you guys agree!' I unfortunately have not been able to find this interview, and it's quite possible I'm confusing this with Mike Reiss (the other showrunner at the time). If anyone has any further information on it, I'd greatly appreciate seeing it. There are likely some more critical reviews of what people would now consider 'the golden years' of the show from this time period as well.
The cast has also spoken up about the series and it's decline in quality as early as the late 90s or early 2000s. Harry Shearer (voice of Burns, Ned, among many others) made some waves a while back stating
he was departing from the series, wanting to pursue other things. He's been vocal about his personal opinions on the show prior to this, such as openly admitting he hated what The Principal and the Pauper did to Skinner's character during production, and was even interviewed
back in 2004, citing the last three seasons (at the time of the interview)
'...as among the worst, so Season 4 looks very good to me now.'
Yeardley Smith (voice of Lisa) had also commented on the cast personally feeling as if 'Marge Vs. The Monorail' as one of the worst episodes they ever did, despite it being a fan favorite (and Conan O'Brien's favorite episode he wrote while on the show's production crew). There's a small citation
here, but I have not read the original source. This citation also claims there were some more personal negative reviews of the episode around the time it aired.
Basically,
a lot of the criticisms towards the show post-Season 3 aren't terribly new. However, I think post-Season 3 is more of the same, but better! It's where the show found comfortable footing and really made the best of it's animated format and satire. It's really all down to personal preference, but I still think a fair amount of the episodes post Season-9 are worth a watch myself.