I'm done here. I've made the point I wanted to. If its not going to be treated seriously and that people are going to jump to "Jake is condoning bigotry", they clearly do not understand the actual issue here.
If you'd like to talk about this with me privately, be my guest. Done checking this thread. Have a good day everyone.
Nobody has said this, nobody is saying this. People might be downvoting you because they disagree with your take on the issue?
Also to your previous point "If someone defending their point is allowed to talk like this, I guess I am to? ", I believe so. You haven't been banned?
the criticism that the initial action should've been handled privately has been accepted as a mistake due to the serious nature of deadnaming causing a bit of a rash reaction.
It was "not taken seriously" so much that Borb made a thread to explain their rationale in face of people criticising it. so I don't get this fantasy of it not being taken seriously?
What else is there? That Thomas and Mavis should have been silenced instead of flinging stuff? Maybe?
Also again I have been taking note of various criticisms about how moderators handling it, which include differing takes
. Some people may be unhappy, some may be happy. Some may be unhappy for the exact opposite reason to others.
There's definitely been a problem about staff of the past not taking things seriously enough, but I believe we are working on changing that.